免费视频淫片aa毛片_日韩高清在线亚洲专区vr_日韩大片免费观看视频播放_亚洲欧美国产精品完整版

打開APP
userphoto
未登錄

開通VIP,暢享免費(fèi)電子書等14項(xiàng)超值服

開通VIP
20071109_1 | CTA
November 09, 2007

California Teachers Association

1705 Murchison Drive
P. O. Box 921
Burlingame, CA 94011-0921
www.cta.org

Contact: Theresa Wheeler - 916-677-5591

 

California Education, Business, Community and Taxpayer Groups Launch Campaign to Oppose Proposition 92

Opponents strongly support community colleges but say the flawed initiative contains no accountability and will ultimately hurt, not help, California


November 09, 2007

Sacramento – A growing coalition of education, business, community and taxpayer groups today announced they have joined forces to oppose Proposition 92 on the February 5, 2008 California primary election ballot.

Uniting under “Californians for Fair Education Funding,” the organizations are working to inform voters that the community college initiative is not what it seems. The campaign coalition includes the California Teachers Association, California Faculty Association, California Chamber of Commerce, California Taxpayers’ Association and California Business Roundtable.

“We strongly support community colleges and the very important role they play in educating California students, but Proposition 92 is a flawed initiative that will cause more problems than it claims it would solve,” said David A. Sanchez, president of the California Teachers Association. “Proposition 92 drains $70 million a year from our public education system with no way to repay those resources and no guarantees that any additional funding will end up helping students.”

Proposition 92 seeks to lock into California’s constitution a huge new spending mandate for community colleges, but includes no way to pay for it. This could mean cuts to K-12 schools and higher education, health care, programs for the disabled or public safety. The measure also requires no public audits, contains no penalties for misuse of funds, and includes no guarantee money will be spent on students. Proposition 92 does, however, give an expanded state board “full power” to set salaries and other benefits for additional bureaucrats and administrators with no independent oversight.

“We are all strong supporters of community colleges and the important role they play in educating Californians, but Prop. 92 is just not the answer to any challenges they face,” said Bill Hauck, president of the California Business Roundtable, whose organization includes improving California’s public schools as a paramount goal.

Lillian Taiz, president of the California Faculty Association stated that “California’s community colleges are important to all of us in higher education, but the fact is, we are all underfunded and helping one public education system at the expense and detriment of others is unacceptable and simply bad public policy.”

Allan Zaremberg, president of the California Chamber of Commerce said, “California businesses strongly support our community college system and believe in the value of the education and training community colleges provide. Community colleges are an integral part of our state’s overall higher education offering. However, California still faces chronic budget deficits - projected to be $10 billion in 2008. The scheme contained in Proposition 92 would further aggravate the state’s budget crisis and threaten California’s ability to address other pressing needs, like funding health care, public safety and education. California just can’t afford Proposition 92.”

The No on 92 campaign points out that while the initiative mandates new spending - almost a billion dollars in just the first three years according to California Legislative Analyst’s Office - it does not identify a way to pay for it.

“The legislature will have to look to taxpayers to foot the bill for the increased costs in Proposition 92 by raising taxes on products and services or hiking our income tax,” said Teresa Casazza, acting president of the California Taxpayers’ Association.

Other opponents of the measure include the League of Women Voters of California and the Small Business Action Committee.

Californians for Fair Education Funding today also announced the launch of the No on Prop. 92 website: www.noprop92.org.


###

The 340,000-member CTA is affiliated with the 3.2 million-member National Education Association.

本站僅提供存儲(chǔ)服務(wù),所有內(nèi)容均由用戶發(fā)布,如發(fā)現(xiàn)有害或侵權(quán)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)點(diǎn)擊舉報(bào)
打開APP,閱讀全文并永久保存 查看更多類似文章
猜你喜歡
類似文章
加州理工學(xué)院,今年蟬聯(lián)世界最佳大學(xué)~
The California Early Childhood Mentor Program
美大學(xué)推出“午夜課堂”半夜三點(diǎn)上課
2012 winter conscription kicks off
Where Do International Students In The U.S. Come From?
?California communities feel pressure to preserve water
更多類似文章 >>
生活服務(wù)
分享 收藏 導(dǎo)長(zhǎng)圖 關(guān)注 下載文章
綁定賬號(hào)成功
后續(xù)可登錄賬號(hào)暢享VIP特權(quán)!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可點(diǎn)擊這里聯(lián)系客服!

聯(lián)系客服